With the Middle East crisis now past its second week and not (yet) showing signs of easing, near-term implications and geopolitical tussles are becoming fairly apparent.
One look at the newspaper headlines over the past week in this part of the world saw claims of air passenger surcharges hike by regional carriers creep up from 35% to 100%. That's unsurprising, given jet fuel has spiked 140% and rising since the crisis began.
Overall, the near-term inflationary impact of the oil price spike (currently seesawing either side of $100 using Brent as a benchmark) would likely be bigger in Asia, outages of LPG will play a bigger role in the Indian subcontinent, while the absence of Qatari LNG - triggering a highest bidder takes all mentality in global LNG markets - would hit Europe the hardest. Of course, it is bad news all around in general.
Most in Asia are preparing for near-term inflation based on the logic that the conflict would end in four to six weeks. That's a punt most traders appear to have taken based on The Oilholic's conversations in Singapore, Tokyo as well as here. But beyond that all bets would likely be off.
Few other chains of thought also emerged over the course of the past week. First, people in this part of the world are surprised over the complete lack of leadership from Europe during such a profound crisis. Most here see the Europeans as sniping from the sidelines so far.
Secondly, no one buys that China is only unhappy with the US and Israel for having started the crisis. Beijing is equally miffed with the Iranians. While public condemnation for Israel and US has been coming since the start of the war, on Wednesday, China also directly criticised Iran for disrupting global crude supplies via the Strait of Hormuz, something it had been doing via private diplomatic channels. Whether or not, Iran's oil is reaching China won't move Beijing. Iran only services a small portion of China's demand bulk of which is met by other Gulf producers whom Tehran is bombing.
Of course, should all of this come to a conclusion or some ceasefire of sorts be achieved say within six weeks from the starting date of hostilities on February 28, it will take better parts of another four to six months for global energy flows to normalise.
The Oilholic discussed these various permutations in interviews and market commentary with the BBC and TRT World while out in Hong Kong. Yours truly also spoke on an Energy Connects webinar with fellow panellists Joe McMonigle, President & CEO of Global Center for Energy Analysis and former Secretary General of International Energy Forum (IEF), Simon Flowers, Chairman and Chief Analyst, Wood Mackenzie, and Chiranjib Sengupta, Editor-in-Chief of Energy Connects. And then rounded-off the week by speaking in a podcast with Gulf Intelligence. .
